Type Of Dr For Ingrown Hair

(and surveillance)

From Corriere
Clash of the common associations

How Long Sleep-eze Take

always judged

From the Tyrrhenian

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Page 11 - Montecatini A trial in error, paid after four years Woman Ponsacco was charged with driving under the influence of drugs, but had misread the report There is not only malpractice but also malagiustizia. I know a woman who Ponsacco after a car accident in June 2006, a mistake has been condemned for driving under the influence of drugs. The news became public and the woman lost her job. Now the judge in court in Pontedera, Giulio Cesare Cipolletta, has acquitted because the crime does not exist. The story begins after a road accident on 12 June 2006. The woman, now 39, was transported to the emergency room Lots of that is subject to certain investigations. The report drawn up by doctors, with the results of the analysis, it was misinterpreted. He left a complaint in a state of freedom against women resulting in signaling to the prefecture of Pisa. Were unnecessary attempts to explain that the woman had not taken any drug. Among the other had just had an accident had left the job. It was not believed, as he also explained to his lawyer, Joanne Cerisano. Neither was given any credence to the report made by a consultant of the parties to which the woman had turned in an attempt to prove that there had been a mistake in reading the analysis and the values \u200b\u200bconsidered to be irregular in reality were not. It always rains in the wet, there's nothing to do

was subjected to the test following a car accident, he lost the job. Now he wants to claim damages to the prosecutor

PONSACCO.

"As a result of this whole story - told the woman during the process - I lost his job, I went through a difficult time." The news of the incident and subsequent complaint also ended up on the pages of local newspapers so as to compromise, as explained by the woman, who could now claim damages to the Public Prosecutor, the relationship with his employer. Yet the defensive advice should not be taken into account and she was even prosecuted. The case was probably treated as one of the many who end up in prosecutor after complaints of driving while intoxicated by alcohol or drugs. The debate served to demonstrate - But in the meantime been four difficult years - that there had been a mistake. The acquittal came even after a long time after the woman has to bear the costs to defend against a crime he did not commit.

Emailconfidentiality Clause From Republic Milan, the sentence had already written the lawyer and not notice the photographer

The President of the Court of Appeal, who signed the document, the fences are talking about personal notes. The lawyer has called the seizure

That dossier on the table of the first President of the Court of Appeal of Milan, did not have formal title of the court. Even before the trial was held, however, already contained the outcome of the verdict. A very singular fact that has not failed to raise controversy within the Palace of Justice.

In the classroom - while the bench has retired to closed session for some processes already discussed - the lawyer Paolo Cerruti, a defender in a case still on the table, browse some booklets on the desk of President John Scaggs. Check it from the stack one on his client, Frank Basile. Peering cards, the lawyer discovers that the decision - even before the debate - has already been written with the confirmation of the first instance: a sentence of eight months for a pickpocket took place at Monza last September shortly before ' Start the Grand Prix.

the return of the court in the courtroom, the lawyer does Cerruti verbalize the episode - reported to the Bar of Milan, four components have arrived in court to ask for the acquisition of the document - while the Attorney General Isabella Pugliese, calls for integration of the bench. While recognizing the abnormality of its consultation documents were not part of the dossier of the case, decide to abstain Scaglioni: To make the replacement process Basile was left for last among those in the program.

"The lawyer has misused the card in my hands - it is shielded with reporters the judge - I had prepared a draft decision, but the decision of the College could be completely different. In the process should be taken into account only the final decision, not what one intends to do. " Replaced the entire formation of the Court, the trial was then held behind closed doors: the Attorney General has requested confirmation of the verdict of First Instance, the defense has instead called for the acquittal.

At the end of the trial court granted a mitigating factor and reduced the sentence from eight to five months. Basile, having served the sentence, will be released and can go home. "I'm not happy - said the lawyer Cerruti - I am convinced that my client deserved absolution."

The beauty is that the judge was also angry because the people looked in the folder: it turns out that arrested the lawyer.